What SIL funding covers — and what it does not
Supported Independent Living (SIL) is one of the most complex and high-value support categories in the NDIS. Understanding how it is priced and funded is essential for any provider seeking or maintaining registration under the strengthened 2026 framework.
SIL funding sits within a participant's Core Supports budget, specifically under the Assistance with Daily Life support category. It funds the day-to-day support that enables a participant to live as independently as possible in shared or individual accommodation — but it does not fund the accommodation itself. That is a common and costly misconception.
Specifically, SIL funding covers:
- Assistance with personal care, hygiene, and daily living tasks
- Active overnight support or passive sleepover supports (each priced differently)
- Supervision and skill-building towards independence
- Support worker time in and around the home
SIL does not cover:
- Rent or utility costs (funded through Specialist Disability Accommodation or mainstream tenancy arrangements)
- Food, personal items, or household consumables
- Transport unless separately funded in the participant's plan
- Capital costs such as home modifications (funded separately under Capital Supports)
How SIL pricing works under the NDIS Pricing Arrangements
The NDIS sets maximum price limits for SIL through its annual Pricing Arrangements and Price Limits document (formerly the Support Catalogue). Providers may charge at or below these limits; they may not charge above them.
SIL rates are structured across several variables:
- Time of day: Weekday daytime, evening, Saturday, Sunday, and public holiday rates each carry different price limits. Public holiday rates are substantially higher.
- Support intensity: Standard, high, and very high support needs attract different rates, reflecting the staffing ratios and skill requirements involved.
- Overnight support type: Active overnight (where a worker is awake and working) is priced at a higher rate than a sleepover (where a worker is on-site but sleeping, available if required).
- Location: Remote and very remote loadings apply in recognised areas, reflecting the genuine cost of service delivery outside metropolitan centres.
Providers must use the correct support item registration group and line item codes when claiming against a participant's plan. Miscoding is a common compliance error picked up during audits and NDIS Commission reviews.
The SIL assessment and funding approval process
Unlike most NDIS supports, SIL funding is not simply included in a participant's plan on request. It requires a specific assessment and approval process involving the NDIS planner or Local Area Coordinator, typically supported by a detailed SIL quote from the proposed provider.
Step 1: Prepare a SIL quote
Registered SIL providers are required to submit a rostering-based quote to the NDIA that documents the participant's assessed support needs across every hour of the week — including active supports, sleepover periods, and any shared support arrangements. The quote must justify the support hours claimed and reflect the participant's individual goals and circumstances.
Step 2: Submit through the provider portal
Quotes are submitted via the myplace provider portal. The NDIA assesses the quote, may request further information, and either approves a SIL funding amount or negotiates adjustments. Approval can take several weeks and providers should build this lead time into their intake processes.
Step 3: Plan funding is allocated
Once approved, the SIL funding amount is included in the participant's Core Supports budget. Providers then claim fortnightly or monthly against this allocated amount. Claims must match the support delivered — retrospective or unsupported claiming is a serious compliance issue.
Step 4: Annual review and re-quoting
SIL funding is typically reviewed at each plan review cycle. If a participant's support needs change materially — due to health changes, a transition to greater independence, or a change in household composition — providers should initiate a mid-plan review rather than continue claiming at an outdated level.
Shared support arrangements and their pricing implications
Many SIL settings involve more than one participant living in the same dwelling. Where a single support worker provides simultaneous assistance to two or more participants, the cost of that worker's time is generally shared across the participants' plans.
The NDIS Pricing Arrangements include specific guidance on shared support ratios and how costs are to be apportioned. Providers must document the support ratios clearly in each participant's service agreement and in their internal rostering systems. Charging each participant for the full cost of a shared worker — rather than their proportionate share — is both a compliance breach and potentially fraudulent.
Providers operating under the 2026 strengthened Practice Standards are expected to demonstrate in their quality management evidence that their pricing and claiming practices reflect actual support delivery, including accurate recording of shared support time.
2026 registration requirements that affect SIL pricing compliance
The NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission's strengthened Practice Standards, which take full effect from 2026 for providers undergoing registration renewal, include several requirements that directly intersect with pricing and financial management:
- Transparency in service agreements: Providers must ensure service agreements clearly state the supports to be delivered, the applicable price limits, and the basis on which supports will be claimed. Vague or outdated service agreements are a common non-conformance finding.
- Financial management evidence: The Practice Standards require providers to demonstrate robust financial management systems, including accurate claiming, reconciliation processes, and controls against over-claiming.
- Participant access to financial information: Participants (or their nominees) must be able to readily access information about how their SIL funding is being used. Providers should have systems to respond to these requests promptly.
- Audit trail for staffing costs: Approved quality auditors will look for evidence that actual hours worked by support workers are recorded and reconciled against claims made. Timesheets, rostering systems, and payroll records are all relevant.
Common pricing compliance errors to avoid
| Error | Risk | Correction |
|---|---|---|
| Charging above the current price limit | Compliance breach, repayment required | Check current Pricing Arrangements document before each claiming period |
| Using the wrong support item code | Invalid claim, audit flag | Map each support type to the correct registration group and line item |
| Splitting shared support costs incorrectly | Over-claiming across multiple participants' plans | Document shared ratios in service agreements and rostering records |
| Claiming active overnight at sleepover rates (or vice versa) | Under-funding or over-claiming | Clearly define and roster each overnight support type |
| Outdated service agreements not reflecting current plan funding | Disputes with participants, auditor finding | Review and re-sign service agreements at each plan review |
Plan management and the SIL claiming pathway
How a participant manages their NDIS plan affects how providers submit claims. Under NDIA-managed plans, providers submit claims directly through the myplace provider portal and are paid by the NDIA. Under plan-managed arrangements, claims go to the participant's plan manager, who pays the provider and claims from the NDIA on their behalf. Self-managed participants pay providers directly and claim reimbursement themselves.
Most SIL participants are NDIA-managed or plan-managed. Providers should confirm the management type at intake and ensure their claiming processes match accordingly. Submitting a claim to the wrong pathway causes payment delays and can trigger compliance flags.
Preparing for a SIL pricing audit
An approved quality auditor assessing a SIL provider's compliance with the Practice Standards will typically examine:
- Sample service agreements — checking they reflect actual funded supports and current price limits
- Rostering and timesheet records — matched against NDIS portal claims for the same period
- SIL quote documentation — confirming quotes were submitted and approved before supports commenced
- Participant consent records — confirming participants understood and agreed to the pricing arrangements
- Financial reconciliation processes — evidence the organisation reviews and corrects any claiming errors
- Policies governing price limit compliance and shared support apportionment
Providers who are approaching their 2026 registration renewal and want a structured, audit-ready compliance documentation set may find the 74-document SIL compliance kit at ndiscompliant.com.au a practical starting point — it covers pricing policies, service agreement templates, and financial management procedures aligned to the strengthened Practice Standards.
Key takeaways for SIL providers
- SIL is funded under Core Supports and requires a rostering-based quote approved by the NDIA before claiming can begin
- Price limits are set annually in the Pricing Arrangements and Price Limits document — always use the current version
- Shared support costs must be accurately apportioned across participants' plans
- The 2026 strengthened Practice Standards require transparent service agreements, robust financial controls, and clear audit trails linking claims to delivered supports
- Miscoding, over-claiming, and outdated service agreements are the most common audit findings in SIL settings
Important: This article provides general guidance about NDIS compliance requirements. It is not legal or professional advice. Requirements may change as the NDIS Commission updates its policies and Practice Standards. Always verify current requirements with the NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission or a registered NDIS consultant before making compliance decisions.