Platform Overview

ShiftCare

ShiftCare is an Australian-built care management platform that has grown rapidly among NDIS, aged care, and home care providers. Founded in Sydney, it focuses on making rostering, billing, and documentation accessible for small to mid-size care organisations. Its per-client pricing model and intuitive interface have made it particularly popular with newer providers and those transitioning from spreadsheets.

ShiftCare's design philosophy prioritises ease of use. Most features can be learned in a single training session, and support workers typically need less than 30 minutes to become comfortable with the mobile app. This low learning curve is a significant advantage for providers with high staff turnover or limited training budgets.

SupportAbility

SupportAbility is one of the longest-established NDIS software platforms in Australia, serving the disability sector since 2005. Developed by Infoxchange (now part of Connecting Up), it has over two decades of refinement based on the specific needs of Australian disability service providers. Its depth of functionality reflects the complexity of disability service delivery.

SupportAbility's design philosophy prioritises comprehensiveness. It handles scenarios that simpler platforms cannot — complex group activity billing, multi-program service delivery, detailed outcome measurement, and advanced reporting. This depth comes at the cost of a steeper learning curve and longer implementation timeline.


Rostering Comparison

Feature ShiftCare SupportAbility
Drag-and-drop scheduling Yes — intuitive interface Yes — functional but dated interface
SCHADS Award interpretation Strong — covers standard scenarios Strong — covers complex scenarios including multiple modern awards
Shift templates Yes — recurring weekly/fortnightly patterns Yes — with more complex pattern options
Availability management Yes — workers submit via app Yes — workers submit via app or web
Conflict detection Automatic double-booking and break alerts Automatic with additional qualification-based checks
Group activity rostering Basic Advanced — supports complex group configurations
SIL/house-based rostering Good Good
Labour cost forecasting Real-time as roster is built Available but less prominent in the workflow

Winner: Tie. ShiftCare wins on usability and visual design. SupportAbility wins on depth for complex rostering scenarios like group activities and multi-award workforces. For straightforward rostering (individual and SIL shifts), both platforms perform well.


Billing and Claiming Comparison

Feature ShiftCare SupportAbility
NDIS Price Guide rates Automatic updates Automatic updates
Line item validation Yes Yes — with more granular control
Bulk claiming (NDIA portal) Yes Yes
Plan manager invoicing Yes Yes
Budget tracking Yes — per participant Detailed — per category with utilisation reports
Group billing (shared support ratios) Basic ratio calculations Advanced — handles complex group billing scenarios
Accounting integration Xero, MYOB Xero, MYOB
Financial reporting Good — standard reports Advanced — detailed revenue analytics

Winner: SupportAbility for complex billing, particularly group support calculations and detailed budget analytics. ShiftCare is more than adequate for providers with straightforward individual billing.


Progress Notes Comparison

Feature ShiftCare SupportAbility
Customisable templates Yes Yes — with more template options
Mandatory field enforcement Basic Advanced — configurable per service type
Goal linking Manual reference Structured goal integration with outcome tracking
Outcome measurement Not available Yes — tracks progress over time with reporting
AI-powered quality checking No No
Photo attachments Yes Yes
Approval workflows Basic Advanced — configurable approval chains
Family portal access Yes — families can view notes Limited

Winner: SupportAbility for its superior outcome measurement and goal tracking. ShiftCare wins on ease of use for workers and family access to notes.

Note Quality Tip

Neither ShiftCare nor SupportAbility includes AI-powered note quality checking. For compliance-grade progress notes with either platform, workers can use the free NDISCompliant Notes Rewriter to rewrite their rough notes into compliant language before entering them into either system.


Participant Management Comparison

Feature ShiftCare SupportAbility
Participant profiles Comprehensive — covers core needs Very deep — extensive customisable fields
Support plan management Good Excellent — with version control and review scheduling
Document storage Yes Yes — with more organisational options
Consent tracking Basic Structured — with expiry alerts
Risk assessments Template-based Structured with escalation workflows
Communication logs Yes Yes — with categorisation
Referral management Basic Advanced — with waitlist management

Winner: SupportAbility. Its two decades of disability sector experience show in the depth of participant record management. ShiftCare covers the essentials well but lacks the depth required for complex, high-need participants.


Mobile App Comparison

Mobile access is critical for NDIS providers since support workers operate in the field, not at desks. The quality of the mobile app directly affects worker adoption and documentation quality.

ShiftCare Mobile

SupportAbility Mobile

Winner: ShiftCare. Its mobile app is consistently praised for usability and performance. Workers with limited technical skills find it easier to adopt. SupportAbility's mobile app is functional but its complexity reflects the platform's depth, which can overwhelm field workers.


Compliance Features Comparison

Feature ShiftCare SupportAbility
Incident reporting Yes — form-based Yes — with workflow and escalation
Complaints tracking Basic Structured register with resolution tracking
Worker screening register Yes — with expiry alerts Yes — with expiry alerts and compliance reporting
Training tracking Basic Comprehensive — training matrix with gap analysis
Continuous improvement register Not built-in Yes — with tracking and reporting
Compliance dashboards Basic overview Detailed with customisable views
Audit trail Standard record history Comprehensive version tracking across all records

Winner: SupportAbility. Its compliance features are significantly more mature, reflecting two decades of development guided by audit requirements. ShiftCare covers the basics but lacks the depth that providers facing complex compliance requirements need.


Pricing Comparison

The pricing models differ fundamentally, which means the cost comparison depends on your provider's specific ratios of staff to participants.

ShiftCare Pricing

SupportAbility Pricing

Cost Comparison Scenarios

Provider Profile ShiftCare (Professional) SupportAbility (Est.)
10 participants, 15 staff ~$150/month ~$200/month
30 participants, 40 staff ~$450/month ~$600/month
50 participants, 80 staff ~$750/month ~$1,000/month
100 participants, 120 staff ~$1,500/month ~$2,000/month

Winner: ShiftCare on base cost at every size tier. However, SupportAbility's higher price reflects deeper functionality. The true cost comparison should factor in the time saved by SupportAbility's advanced features — if you need those features, the price difference may be justified by reduced administrative effort.

Pricing Disclaimer

Prices shown are estimates based on publicly available information as at April 2026. Both platforms offer customised pricing based on specific requirements. Always request a current quote directly from the vendor before making purchasing decisions.


Customer Support Comparison

ShiftCare Support

ShiftCare provides email and in-app chat support during Australian business hours. Response times are generally good for a platform of its size. The knowledge base and video tutorials are comprehensive and well-maintained. Onboarding includes guided setup and training for administrators.

SupportAbility Support

SupportAbility offers phone, email, and online support during business hours. As an established platform, its support team has deep experience with disability sector-specific questions. The documentation is extensive. Implementation support is more structured than ShiftCare's, reflecting the platform's greater complexity and the longer onboarding timeline.

Winner: Tie. Both platforms provide adequate support. SupportAbility's support team has deeper sector expertise; ShiftCare's support materials are more modern and accessible for self-service learning.


Summary Comparison Table

Category ShiftCare SupportAbility Winner
RosteringStrong, intuitiveStrong, complex scenariosTie
BillingGood for standard billingAdvanced, group billingSupportAbility
Progress notesEasy, family accessGoal tracking, outcomesSupportAbility
Participant managementCovers essentialsDeep, comprehensiveSupportAbility
Mobile appModern, fast, easyFunctional, complexShiftCare
Compliance featuresBasic coverageComprehensiveSupportAbility
PricingMore affordableHigher cost, more featuresShiftCare
Learning curveShort (days)Long (weeks)ShiftCare
Setup time1-2 weeks4-8 weeksShiftCare
Best for1-50 staff20-200+ staffDepends on size

The Verdict — Which Should You Choose?

Choose ShiftCare If:

Choose SupportAbility If:

Consider a Third Option If:

For comprehensive reviews of all NDIS software options, read our Best NDIS Software for Providers in 2026 comparison guide.

Whichever Platform You Choose, Documentation Quality Matters

Neither ShiftCare nor SupportAbility will write your progress notes for you or generate your audit documentation. Both platforms store and manage the records you create, but the quality of those records depends on your workers' documentation skills.

The NDISCompliant Notes Rewriter improves documentation quality regardless of which platform you choose. And for providers preparing for NDIS certification, the SIL Rescue Kit provides the 65 audit-ready policy documents that complement your operational software.

Important: This article provides general guidance about NDIS compliance requirements. It is not legal or professional advice. Requirements may change as the NDIS Commission updates its policies and Practice Standards. Always verify current requirements with the NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission or a registered NDIS consultant before making compliance decisions.